Where it differs: On paper it lists hazelnut and brown sugar that the original does not, and does not list the original's pear or tonka bean.
The best bottles under USD 40
Ranked by similarity, one entry per bottle, low-confidence comparisons left out. The saving is against the fragrance each one is compared with.
Where it differs: Reduced longevity and sillage with weaker base notes.
Where it differs: On paper it lists cherry liqueur and cherry that the original does not, and does not list the original's liquor.
Where it differs: The published notes line up closely; wearers mainly report differences in strength and longevity.
Where it differs: The published notes line up closely; wearers mainly report differences in strength and longevity.
Where it differs: The published notes line up closely; wearers mainly report differences in strength and longevity.
Where it differs: On paper it lists resin and ebony that the original does not.
Where it differs: On paper it does not list the original's magnolia or mandarin orange.
Where it differs: Close but not a perfect match according to one reviewer.
Where it differs: On paper it lists spices and resins that the original does not, and does not list the original's pelargonium or patchouli.
Where it differs: On paper it lists leather and amber that the original does not, and does not list the original's black currant or lemon.
Where it differs: Drier than the original, more woody than sporty.
Where it differs: On paper it does not list the original's african orange flower or benzoin.
Where it differs: On paper it lists quince and rhubarb that the original does not, and does not list the original's melon or rhuburb.
Where it differs: On paper it lists olibanum and osmanthus that the original does not, and does not list the original's olibanum osmanthus or jasmine sambac sandalwood.
Where it differs: Less aggressive than the original, with jasmine and gardenia blended more gently.
Where it differs: Sweeter and more gourmand.
Where it differs: Marginally shorter longevity but projects harder; leans sweeter with more peony.
Where it differs: On paper it lists apple and honey that the original does not, and does not list the original's jasmine or carnation.
Where it differs: On paper it lists vanilla infusion and vanilla surabsolute that the original does not, and does not list the original's amber woods.
Where it differs: Shifts to a woody-oud profile suited to autumn and winter.
Where it differs: Adds herbal elements the original lacks, with weaker longevity.
Where it differs: Trades base note depth for a brighter profile.
Where it differs: The published notes line up closely; wearers mainly report differences in strength and longevity.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Prices are typical US bottle prices when the house publishes one; Amazon's price on the day can differ.